A call for bold ideas for a new agricultural paradigm.
The Land Institute has dedicated the past 40 years to researching a new way to grow our food that mimics the fertility and resilience of natural systems like prairies. Instead of the resource-wasting, monocropping approach that our current system relies upon, The Land Institute is focusing on developing a new agricultural method based on perennial grains and polyculture to create high yields and healthier soils while minimizing or eliminating reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides.
While the overall Biomimicry Global Design Challenge is open to any food system design solution (nature-inspired, of course!), The Land Institute is offering a $1000 prize for the best submission that addresses their specific design brief. Winners of the Land Institute prize are still eligible for all of the other Biomimicry Global Design Challenge prizes, including the $100,000 Ray C. Anderson Foundation “Ray of Hope” Prize.
Design an agroecological approach to crop succession—replacing perennial crops with other perennial crops without disrupting the soil and its food web, and without releasing significant amounts of carbon dioxide.
Land Institute Brief
Problem and scope
Annual grains provide 70% of humanity’s caloric needs, and they occupy a majority of cropland on the planet. In order to produce grains, farmers use brute strength (the plow) or chemicals (herbicides) or both every year to knock back native and weedy vegetation that competes with grain-producing annual grasses, such as wheat, maize, rice and sorghum. While remarkably productive from the perspective of yields, this approach to growing food is unsustainable in terms of soil loss and degradation, as well as the monetary, energetic, and environmental costs of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. Examples of impacts from high input monocropped grain agroecosystems include:
Ecologically there are many differences between agricultural ecosystems and the native ecosystems they replace, but two characteristics stand out in their universality and importance—native ecosystems are made up of multiple plant species, and the dominant plant species are perennial, whereas grains are grown as annual monocultures. Ecological intensification is increasingly being used to describe supplanting the use of purchased inputs with ecological processes. Achieving ecological intensification in annual crop agriculture is challenging given the inherently compromised nature of the ecosystems. By integrating diversity and perenniality into agroecosystems, ecosystem functions such as soil building, nutrient retention, pest suppression, and carbon sequestration will happen as a result of such an agroecosystem, which behaves much more like the native ecosystem that was replaced.
While perennial polycultures hold considerable promise for addressing many of the intrinsic shortcomings of present-day annual grain production, we envision a long stretch of time when fields cropped to perennial grains will need replacement every five to ten years. This could occur simply because improved crop varieties have become available, or because a crop has accumulated a pathogen load or genetic load that suppresses yield, or the economics of particular crop choices have shifted. Regardless of the reason, the approach to replacing stands of perennial crops will prove to be critical, as neither of the two common approaches that exist today—the plow and the herbicide—are desirable in the long run.
Replacing perennial crops by terminating the old stand with a moldboard plow will result in substantial loss of soil organic matter, and a disruption of the later-successional soil microbial community, not to mention greater vulnerability to erosion. Replacing perennial crops by terminating the old stand with herbicides introduces a dependency on purchased, fossil-fuel based chemicals, most likely in potent mixtures or “cocktails” in order to kill well established perennial vegetation. While less detrimental to the soil resource, herbicides have their own Achilles’ heel. The recent finding that Roundup is a likely carcinogen, coupled with older conclusive reports detailing the health hazards associated with herbicides such as atrazine and 2-4-D, render chemical-facilitation of crop replacement a temporary solution at best.
The biomimicry design challenge we pose is this: How can we harness ecological processes to essentially promote “crop succession” in order to periodically renew perennial polycultures? The list that follows is not intended to be exhaustive or restrictive, rather it simply provides examples of what design solutions to this challenge might look like: